The media coverage of the intricate humanitarian catastrophe stemming from the influx of Rohingya refugees in Aceh, Indonesia, in 2023 significantly influences public perception and governmental decision-making. This situation is intricately linked to security concerns. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the media’s portrayal of the Rohingya refugee situation in Aceh as a national security issue, with a specific emphasis on the arrivals in 2023. The research employed a qualitative methodology encompassing discourse analysis, case studies, and document analysis to investigate the evolution of media frameworks and their impact on public opinion and governmental actions. The findings illustrate the interaction of conflicting narratives—frames emphasizing security risks, cultural differences, and humanitarian issues. This case study analyzes the media’s representation of the initial humanitarian emphasis and its subsequent shift towards securitization. Research indicates that media coverage significantly impacts public opinion, perceptions of refugees, and the mechanisms of securitization that rationalize stronger security measures and impede social integration efforts. This study underscores the difficulties of managing conflicting narratives, combating disinformation, and improving media literacy. The findings underscore the necessity of many perspectives, media literacy, and ethical journalism to mitigate the adverse impacts of securitization and promote a more inclusive, rights-oriented framework for refugee protection. These findings contribute to overarching dialogues regarding media framing, securitization, and the protection of refugees.